From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id ECBB8387088F; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:32:29 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ECBB8387088F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1679578349; bh=jTBsu+1f4SYJiUwDXMbO4By/JG6gLjmfQN/cJ2+mq9k=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XyaLcbDD/pnhoTrQpbvNPn1m0uUEF2YSlNf56dsQOVr4F+o4P7uR0NSSnsCLVnLFm b+Y0m7vcwI3Qe60Emf4SAu4Gwwwku9B10Cdae2m8Yn0TfAbN5OegHpdFFLRZ+eFLQ2 g5zxAr/EGyvCkthMnn1POPommke1XvzX9QS91Oyc= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1 Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:32:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107532 --- Comment #27 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59bfdd5f467292a368d0d628084a4b65d1bb06bb commit r13-6830-g59bfdd5f467292a368d0d628084a4b65d1bb06bb Author: Marek Polacek Date: Fri Mar 17 14:36:10 2023 -0400 c++: further -Wdangling-reference refinement [PR107532] Based on , it seems like we should treat *any* class with a reference member as a reference wrapper. To suppress the warning in int i =3D 42; auto const& v =3D std::get<0>(std::tuple(i)); we have to look into base classes as well. For std::tuple, this means that we have to check the _Head_base subobject, which is a non-direct base class of std::tuple. So I've employed a DFS walk. PR c++/107532 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * call.cc (class_has_reference_member_p): New. (class_has_reference_member_p_r): New. (reference_like_class_p): Don't look for a specific constructor. Use a DFS walk with class_has_reference_member_p_r. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference11.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference12.C: New test.=