From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0F8623858404; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 17:02:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0F8623858404 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678467775; bh=Cj9UL+vhnY1zKKwmMI9Fnj7d17FO1XAzEVBr6J/LthA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=T4pIfhbMiECnoNU2emHiijx50jXeAiQgXOqrnmqWsfebPyabqIeR0F05bcDIXrLYZ Ypt2cvFmAmpE88EZvU6APzSphSMmcO7gRuTrNxlgz47UMiQ5W4gsUafDmUOXQ0NIcf Hd8DfFIlFVYeaOekqKQ++0YyxGO25GChEb7l2ylQ= From: "pobrn at protonmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false positives in libcamera-0.0.1 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 17:02:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pobrn at protonmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107532 --- Comment #17 from Barnab=C3=A1s P=C5=91cze = --- The simple test case with std::span still triggers the warning: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/43cKxdqr3. I feel that without deeper code analys= is such a warning will generate too many false positives and people will simply turn it off.=