From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A2EF23858C52; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:29:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A2EF23858C52
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682634592;
	bh=MAbQsAl7BgNRCiTmMsXeth+hQg7Wc+bCqW29/7501zg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mRAlOpqkuVwokYMlZnQrYSf47WkEMEnEBwVz42CJp0VTX7nmTqOILx25fV/GzmzYP
	 xdzku8mO2kTT/Q51oZRA+SPwSF8quTfJ82uE513u+UD/nYtURcgbbgOLcYysgQnW52
	 13ReTd74tHFID0XYHTL8qe/sSX/E7sY9RgFvirNQ=
From: "cuzdav at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107532] [13 Regression] -Werror=dangling-reference false
 positives in libcamera-0.0.1
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 22:29:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cuzdav at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107532-4-MU0MrMWchQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107532-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107532-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107532

Chris Uzdavinis <cuzdav at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cuzdav at gmail dot com

--- Comment #33 from Chris Uzdavinis <cuzdav at gmail dot com> ---
Could an attribute or annotation be added so we can mark our classes to opt=
-out
of this warning for them?

I like the warning in general but it is hitting one of our core "span-like"
classes that stores pointers, and is going off so much that I'm going to ne=
ed
to disable it.  I'd be much happier disabling it on a per-object basis, rat=
her
than globally.=