From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CCDA23858C50; Mon,  7 Nov 2022 13:47:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CCDA23858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667828854;
	bh=s1P1udIuxagIWRZz81h/lrPH42mITuLMa5/4fJVva/4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RayMOVpC9UXx7/Y4a2J5Fwfuoq9o2aYioDqV8ExfZoOVPDl2PJDigfJZfyfTh1TK4
	 7Ws63bHiNJOVuLlzh1gC1d7OGEK5gwziWS3CtArlcnnAc4JmdoE+ws5+slASyMb5L/
	 Rai3IR/Zgt6B8BoeXAAut/qWohXgh2W0Egq7h7vw=
From: "i.nixman at autistici dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107546] [10/11/12/13 Regression] simd, redundant pcmpeqb
 and pxor
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 13:47:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: i.nixman at autistici dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107546-4-BPwcrgbwxx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107546-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107546

--- Comment #10 from niXman <i.nixman at autistici dot org> ---
yes, fixed for the `master`.

```
foo:
.LFB6604:
        .cfi_startproc
        movdqu  (%rdi), %xmm1
        movdqa  .LC0(%rip), %xmm0
        pcmpgtb %xmm1, %xmm0
        ret
        .cfi_endproc
.LFE6604:
```

can it be applied at least for gcc-12 branch ?=