From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8EFD838A90BF; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:02:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8EFD838A90BF DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670252566; bh=1arH9Vh0msnZe7YvcyaYNXLJvMrYWalDr1CTNWiI/2g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XOObVtt6bRODZw8Hm4BJPkbTq4jjWA+zrB+JbU6iOigDAraPmoJnTiWn+xcUXEfTl d1GayYb95CJqHJxX5olceMz27/2qrrFnlEVID/j0zDQoW3zcistpFvr21rsHJhfS+G CgmR2BW2k3vxAb3V7WuZf+w3Toqa6ZiM44ajFwn4= From: "brjd_epdjq36 at kygur dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for "x86-64" Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 15:02:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: brjd_epdjq36 at kygur dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107551 --- Comment #20 from Brjd --- The test gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c is patched. But gcc/config/i386/i386-builtins.cc looks like it is from another versio= n. I attached it as i386-builtins-orig-12.2.0.cc to compare them and asking if= you could correct it with your patch.=