From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7492C392AC01; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:17:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7492C392AC01 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670253421; bh=Qrx41c3quiUd+A6W6NAPqYbQCzLIKqgTkmPDrETUgDA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=C2A2ftdY9P3r6ZdNY2LBVBapZKiRTJ08LlmE7txkrV8M101FKLhm+Pc6mUttjBaCQ 1LjbZqexte/lLQHxs/jxD3j2M/ipgh7KipA1djJY25EKdMlmuV1Zun1QcZ6F8GQwOq wxAb0V12P2ADN/dLlEdk1KrxrEhTKKy0dgHSHeMo= From: "brjd_epdjq36 at kygur dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for "x86-64" Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 15:17:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: brjd_epdjq36 at kygur dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107551 --- Comment #22 from Brjd --- Maybe not changing now is the correct way for now since I may change it bli= ndly not knowing completely what I am doing. Let the developers correct it and w= ill include it in next releases. The compiler is excellent and at least it may build older sourced while the newer ones will be waiting for revisions.=