From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C4A763852202; Fri,  9 Dec 2022 13:25:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C4A763852202
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1670592341;
	bh=UnNOrE920yJmWAhAHJp9frgpzO2BJJ3+7bkCCkKzeig=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=HAHqate888Vg9InwXiLNbhSKjyhvWq0MBN49X3mRtn/REZ2F4/S0PRaOj+Jq7T9dg
	 ut4eSiTvY/Qo3sWkF3CkrD8vX6eDs4WNhddDA7XA2yHEP0yR5WPRSrXKUZvvT/fp/k
	 h8A1zNwFWgnkvN2TQUs50t5cDfUPfCEm5OvyZHz0=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative
 integer for "x86-64"
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 13:25:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107551-4-St4hS5qi27@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107551

--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
<marxin@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ec102e3290ff1cac457420a1219fa1ca3bbbb70

commit r12-8966-g5ec102e3290ff1cac457420a1219fa1ca3bbbb70
Author: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri Nov 25 13:05:56 2022 +0100

    i386: fix assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64") >=3D 0)

    Similar story as PR103661, we again return a negative number
    for __builtin_cpu_supports:

    Documentation says:

    int __builtin_cpu_supports(const char *feature)
    This function returns a positive integer if the run-time CPU supports
feature and returns 0 otherwise.
    while we return -2147483648.

    Moreover, I noticed "x86-64" is not a valid option for __builtin_cpu_is,
    but for __builtin_cpu_supports.

    PR target/107551

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            * config/i386/i386-builtins.cc (fold_builtin_cpu): Use same path
            as for PR103661.
            * doc/extend.texi: Fix "x86-64" use.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c: Add more checks.

    (cherry picked from commit d71b20fc30965ba8326ad9363d0aca9d61eb4ed3)=