From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 76B06385516F; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:46:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 76B06385516F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1669376807; bh=tf86Dy5z7kDN9YcGt++sN+BWK9V4e5sdHxNTM1g7z2s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ltccPk9h2rVJ95Yh/CozRqw9ouKjUzuv9oNJSeDLX6Sr780nEra21UYTpEVlsx562 ePhpKSuHcSCx36Px5WBY+8xPB2lUSYdQADT6mQZk5pWAfrlZGN0GsIu2OcjumbUl+x LfQuA4nVoiWaM8/pT6pwACauji1LgmhbgG0ZS/cM= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_is returns a negative integer for x86-64 Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 11:46:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107551 Martin Li=C5=A1ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |wrong-code --- Comment #10 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- One can easily reproduce that locally with: assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64") >=3D 0);=