From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 701803802924; Fri,  9 Dec 2022 09:21:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 701803802924
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1670577687;
	bh=hPIBrAHvIq31ZPY7hDI43aPrBpRFiB5cZr0PYfb4MZ8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wIBhCcIe7ZvD5RCGR2fw/W0ek5vDqJqqJiT1vjuWf3p5QXwp1JL/BqCI69aOiAVy5
	 8sbeQOvUCyXYxH8orxpZlcRsj7BaXc5TBMUujwfxGuHkKnOl9egOvmJWe53WTo+jRt
	 8ohCadyX2HKREyIC3PNi+yNHNbEPzXBWuKXdNf5Y=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative
 integer for "x86-64"
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 09:21:11 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107551-4-XtDpAHKPtp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107551

--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska <marxin@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d71b20fc30965ba8326ad9363d0aca9d61eb4ed3

commit r13-4581-gd71b20fc30965ba8326ad9363d0aca9d61eb4ed3
Author: Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri Nov 25 13:05:56 2022 +0100

    i386: fix assert (__builtin_cpu_supports ("x86-64") >=3D 0)

    Similar story as PR103661, we again return a negative number
    for __builtin_cpu_supports:

    Documentation says:

    int __builtin_cpu_supports(const char *feature)
    This function returns a positive integer if the run-time CPU supports
feature and returns 0 otherwise.
    while we return -2147483648.

    Moreover, I noticed "x86-64" is not a valid option for __builtin_cpu_is,
    but for __builtin_cpu_supports.

    PR target/107551

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            * config/i386/i386-builtins.cc (fold_builtin_cpu): Use same path
            as for PR103661.
            * doc/extend.texi: Fix "x86-64" use.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c: Add more checks.=