From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id ED1E038187E1; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:54:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ED1E038187E1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670241270; bh=EUfbv+szfxY6yoA4eA+AM/vjeVORosGxOl1vVf9D8Ac=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=UW1Mppdn+dLLu7RKaAlHSngaV2ZigqlCl/sJZImj5PhB2Gc97mVZIiDVwxynlZoUn pp+LNEgku3lhPXDEloBPgeHSDGsmi6ocKwJgfbEI0jssBT0sdVExlkVCPR8INKdsW4 a3XKT93rozXAUKvFFZA7Ou5UTf4GDIchehwLzqQ4= From: "brjd_epdjq36 at kygur dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for "x86-64" Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 11:54:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: brjd_epdjq36 at kygur dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107551 --- Comment #16 from Brjd --- I mean that as I can see, your patch makes changes only to the test and no= t to the compiler ? If it does not, and it changes the compiler source also, the= n I have to rebuild the whole compiler to test it again. But If only the test is misconfigured, forget about it, and the compiler works great, then I will u= se it for the next build. Thank you a lot.=