From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 02B5E38187D6; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:28:47 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 02B5E38187D6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1670239728; bh=TEaYlaKw/XbuTL3Wb1v8KNVWimWIDnHc3v+69PvtgzY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=a6LoLSK3uASDrJtfst5j/xgt1rNQQRaZBU54PGc+bvxeXnQSolDuVWWRdWJl27Ih9 n6Cxujq6u4EBMQU0OEzO9SQR4bXbfO615PKlkBTWDShVqRImQpbNsOpN+gD6O0JuLY Jnhg2bj5Gb126x35BR5lMWGgsj7E5BRIjHgmtdbM= From: "brjd_epdjq36 at kygur dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107551] __builtin_cpu_supports returns a negative integer for "x86-64" Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 11:28:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: brjd_epdjq36 at kygur dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107551 --- Comment #14 from Brjd --- Maybe it is better if we test it in the next release 12.3 or 13.1 since now= the test will be correct, ok, but when building source with the compiler, it wi= ll not make any difference and make no problems at all?=