From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8503D3858282; Tue,  8 Nov 2022 17:07:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8503D3858282
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667927263;
	bh=ATkMCIuSIQccDX48XeLsn2CcII/+Bivx9e7O8PKfmbg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yv+lA2Nt15m9PRVUsce5Gwv41eXgThh2AjeCe4O6cSEApKQR3EYzvmOiCP+DD9eIm
	 xqjqlbgKj5PvPA0CZwa8W1q5An6wadclmeWjwZCFT6sX/MTBzAZg31ezZPgushupna
	 S7+jTk1Z9Czlo7Tgcxx2VEfVI7fKKOpes32SYVhw=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107555] Never constructed object destroyed during exception
 handling
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 17:07:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: EH, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107555-4-3JauM8bBCi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107555-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107555

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Boris Kolpackov from comment #6)
> I was under the impression that only something runnable would be useful, =
but

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need

> if all that's need is a preprocessed translation unit, then that's no
> problem at all. I've also attached the translation unit with the workarou=
nd
> for your reference.

Thanks for attaching them.=