From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4B8793858C52; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:36:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4B8793858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668072987; bh=ccV8BLGuXasZlImgOb2zXjmwB1XdpY/ytxZUzl9KZTU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EU3OwXiz9C3C4ZOZv6NfFK4Pnn5BJvKPX92IhkmQsb2QwJ2kAuW+AXM2/5/HFerbT ZBsNZIUmfh6ClE49xKwzOr+PYrc3PonaO9JRULhDqEemWhLQfIzI54UGu4c0Sgbwwy VskNeB7qg4kAqyjSinP31z//9flwv/JXKtCDIqdA= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize std::isfinite since r13-3596 Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:36:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107569 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 53865 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D53865&action=3Dedit gcc13-pr107569.patch Here is an updated patch (including the incremental patch) with some fixes. Previous version caused some ICEs, that is now fixed, but there is +FAIL: gcc.dg/fold-overflow-1.c scan-assembler-times 2139095040 2 regression (will file a separate PR about it, it isn't just the multiplicat= ion regression but already addition), and +FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_g0_6.f08 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test +FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_g0_6.f08 -O3 -g execution test +FAIL: math +FAIL: special_functions/08_cyl_bessel_j/check_value.cc execution test +FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/09_cyl_bessel_j/check_value.cc execution test I need to investigate.=