From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4A4313858D3C; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:34:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A4313858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668080098;
	bh=P5ievfFQN6xNg7E96KruETPwl75zQeJmNmKzqe+nD8o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=r3ZWAngCue1ZmPYPqTP43+Ikb+r5Th2kswItCPDR9r4BjtrxR2awlC8YdBTd5OymM
	 U8DstlFsLsA1ZGqpaVvaO7YoieggnqvibMS91x45Xh6T7A7QpW6C72v7Bl0ccxxqfa
	 wR+1Bb+0UPRmggTgaCII9oMAvnKM0AnvvxC3EifI=
From: "aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107569] [13 Regression] Failure to optimize
 std::isfinite since r13-3596
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:34:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107569-4-lcr0K57psH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107569-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107569-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107569

--- Comment #25 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #23)
> Created attachment 53866 [details]
> gcc13-pr107569.patch
>=20
> Updated version of the patch I'll test now (if you don't have any nits).
> Besides the thinko I've changed rv_fold to have relation_kind argument ra=
ther
> than relation_trio, passing the latter to a function that doesn't take
> ranges of
> the operands/result but just the real values is weird.

And yes, OK by me.  You're far more qualified to opine in this area :).=20
Thanks.=