From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3DF17385840B; Tue,  8 Nov 2022 17:45:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3DF17385840B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1667929549;
	bh=Ta5u9SXEGGghvOyCqO4ECT/8hdo9MZqmgM9w08W1x+k=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=flrUvd3JS3+DL9XRZ99BNb75YpywdRKCAkCv3Q0haZsFfPKllmnXqs3ZCYhPIcr2C
	 RcIFD+lF8cf7b2XFgJ+oVAH5UtD2xqoa0DBv+QyxxsZZjv8loPlDX8IfxHaBMASl09
	 UviIuBS7Seb2YFwAq4nDKPqhEVnXs5EqJSdo+AcU=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107574] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: tree check in
 cp_fold_convert with ptr to member field cast inside a class not completed
 and inherent
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 17:45:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-107574-4-pG8W5Tklhs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107574

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |8.1.0
      Known to fail|                            |7.5.0, 9.1.0

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In GCC 7 and before, GCC rejected the code:
<source>:5:1: error: non-constant condition for static assertion
 static_assert((int(B::*))&C::k, ""); };
 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
<source>:5:15: error: a reinterpret_cast is not a constant expression
 static_assert((int(B::*))&C::k, ""); };
               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~=