From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B6E5A3858D33; Wed,  9 Nov 2022 21:17:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B6E5A3858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668028640;
	bh=VAAvXXte0FMPD4BTojmgThlqQKrdkDgFi+i0Q4KXRX8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IxtAQTqLcIwLN5TSYhtvJyQeOQW4g9UqRvf5JUzEr1vgkv+FRaX1ADU/TqMfZ+Aym
	 fRuT63aOzGFSCbVlJntdzlHMuaNyT/+ey0X6qeZTYIayrekX8SqO7sFTVEVhPAgcEx
	 n3zPcmd/nZj2iw2TuaRfbBaiZqn0bSesvLvCckHg=
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/107595] [13 Regression] ICE in ix86_push_argument, at
 config/i386/i386.cc:4335
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 21:17:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-107595-4-DEqnMSz2ri@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107595-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107595

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-09
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
I can't reproduce it on x86-64.  The code is

static bool
ix86_push_argument (unsigned int npush)
{
  /* If SSE2 is available, use vector move to put large argument onto
     stack.  NB:  In 32-bit mode, use 8-byte vector move.  */
  return ((!TARGET_SSE2 || npush < (TARGET_64BIT ? 16 : 8))=20
          && TARGET_PUSH_ARGS
          && !ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS);
}

It shouldn't segfault.=