From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E06363858C30; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:54:37 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E06363858C30
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1674046477;
	bh=zUN90Dol/7uVsqV2/kGsZ3AML/5LGFE2z+pHhEkCMb0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kLHw/8BvyYIMLvI6m7+fsGMPstE7LGE8rl9QCJmaHFsU4Q6REwn2vNyupnbUc/6gm
	 k316ft2WNFzvj6z/vuWbK25ALeijrQayYaOJUj1flUhc9Cxu26R8Q4WbYV04onJ4bg
	 O2l5eLtONfZ5r36cGEcdKuFcecZL4ff/SYeoHRVU=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107608] [13 Regression] Failure on
 fold-overflow-1.c and pr95115.c
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:54:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107608-4-69jpCd1Ayf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107608-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107608-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107608

--- Comment #37 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I guess so.  But we should look at the glibc math failures/PR106805.=