From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 927A33858C83; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:58:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 927A33858C83
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673906302;
	bh=61T9UK1cMca5Tajo2FZmRb2N/zfV/QGPpOMaDbic7BM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ophDlcxC4V54goyyWAThnEy3stMveB0HaPFCsfIPXzIHRw3huxvUVTqw44I0HZ45c
	 2IgV8BvREsXtvUzO0AaPad/ZbpcOY4qe4DrpVJ5uF9dDEJijrvQWiF+P5SixnNDaEe
	 8o75gnR5hjr1F58uOoOF4nyiGnCnXgTOSo1Wsf2c=
From: "fw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107608] [13 Regression] Failure on
 fold-overflow-1.c and pr95115.c
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 21:58:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107608-4-qVfCTZJHEy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107608-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107608-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107608

--- Comment #35 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I backported the fixes for building glibc to 2.34 last week, I really expect
the testsuite to be clean there (on x86-64), and on later releases as well.=