From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4F9C838582AB; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:20:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4F9C838582AB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668158415;
	bh=SrIM4ajLoFQSXKve1O0P6QGEHLR/y9j0+UCYh65USTY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=H9CHYDYh+Us3yqBf26vJCIP9dLeKhFgrdOa/3kW0wIjAbivpX9pQptbbuIjAitV6S
	 U2/c0vMdJ529Qduwe9KfLYNSy5M8Kmk5sC6AkvLT4bGgcDtlPDnYpmhZIdqYBDcg7R
	 rPN/tQFICoO7PT8psxMAKD1875ZQcFMbL95hMQSc=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107622] Missing optimization of switch-statement
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:20:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-107622-4-Ls8Lj0mBx4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107622

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Did you try -fstrict-enums?=