From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 076103858D35; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:16:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 076103858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668161816;
	bh=HFUjVAnQKzYfLlJ+MCi1fWK5GXfKrDdE7lFRekraG5c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kxddjXSbTvY7iTTorB122CQ5mfg4hse38rJCesaYDcJ//lxaNaIMoBiLxr0rYk1RY
	 ydC9mT/q+vCZmlkWzwZvYlw/B2eHn8WsHFZ6OUG0BjouQuQME+lYaNFJN/Ht20KNn/
	 4erfqq8yKIcU888OxEZRElq3DdP3+IM5xe/6ld6s=
From: "klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107622] Missing optimization of switch-statement
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:16:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107622-4-lDLCR7fHhS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107622

--- Comment #6 from Wilhelm M <klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Did you try -fstrict-enums?

Yes, that doesn't change anything.=