From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E8FB83858D20; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:11:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E8FB83858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668111064;
	bh=PYJ1Fj5oriA91ipI44pHiDhMCGSgGRHBTcR0rLYuGsU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=iZdTJog7vJ955W1hXKODkyI1JgX4EJlth4gQ38adc5M8zHcNObSCzT4/afEdHe46V
	 D2+CyAXyH7U/GQY4HM6QcqqwA4PvQGqUuKjJ/9tCqxNTG1iOlxFApmW1uWBxspaWV8
	 5ZOaGWnaaMeNGTisrBEYaFftDiRYs8KiYnL+0D98=
From: "klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107622] New: Missing optimization of switch-statement
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 20:11:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-107622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107622

            Bug ID: 107622
           Summary: Missing optimization of switch-statement
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

In the following example the default-case could not be reached. Therefore
introducing std::unreachable() should be useless. But the compiler produces
slightly better code with std::unreachable() as it removes one (unneccessar=
y)
comparison (tested for x86 and avr targets).

volatile uint8_t o;

enum class State : uint8_t {A, B, C};

void g(const State s) {
    switch(s) {
    case State::A:
        o =3D 10;
        break;
    case State::B:
        o =3D 11;
        break;
    case State::C:
        o =3D 12;
        break;
    default:
//        std::unreachable(); // __builtin_unreachable();
        break;
    }
}=