From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8D7E33857C43; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 21:45:30 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8D7E33857C43
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668116730;
	bh=OdG/foc+XEroDhTLpQq3cJ0hYXkzmYWeaW0O2GdTinM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fCYcMcaXdMBZ64hwqxVIhiRQi25ePZqMsvswg+nqMec0AmTZ2umKRRMoIVckQ3/4T
	 KI+KqjYa8SsZ9q8bQPQ6JBFqAyhOpw1aX24slyEJy5jCEe+IzhCYn8qzN1jVG+5hi9
	 wg4GwlE4A15ynLa6mpjx1d/+xUHnBWesv8QLlkfw=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107624] [c++23] Wrong code with static operator ()
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 21:45:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107624-4-fNYxtpCIH1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107624-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107624-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107624

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is interesting because clang also does not produce a call for the foo
either for "foo (0) (0);".=