From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D5C673858D20; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 16:58:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D5C673858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668185895;
	bh=JHdeFcKcvS2xELjJ+ie13IocThp/IWUC1a6fmr6/7eI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Mqr2mYBts9kL2k/lRErVQNklWEaNgQ9YO1b07BAMEeY+kpL02QLeBjBxnqIo4TBZa
	 Puo7fIlRv2NxgfgYQkvg0zun8e6xAisoQlo/DrtIkUletNjhpnO9hoF8veOJn3sY0W
	 MPewFLNJRN61DRF/0kx7EMTWxeqWwsVJvycS+HEg=
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/107646] RFE: can we reimplement gcc-python-plugin's
 cpychecker as a -fanalyzer plugin?
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 16:58:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107646-4-reWwuuhhzU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107646-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107646-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107646

--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In particular, reference-count checking would probably be the most interest=
ing
aspect of the project.=