From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 04CAC3858D35; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 18:53:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 04CAC3858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1692298427; bh=vzuJLOJyK9D9NpvG+oPWdDzadbeMwYt8dFx8c4Aa/rI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QdkqyLNN8iDHJz75JswoeKnA/Q0YrU6L27BLrW0DAQ91nkI7AcaFTLl/n5io0+MJV dknGCGmFDPfur/uTrn2UpTgtif8v1cyPi/JWGUDVkz5tk8bwfi5sVXRGW4KwfKFuAU W0dq3iFaR5kasUK1r9LrNLFTWmV4FybGTVxptl68= From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug analyzer/107646] RFE: can we reimplement gcc-python-plugin's cpychecker as a -fanalyzer plugin? Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 18:53:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107646 --- Comment #7 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #6) > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) > Some attribute ideas: >=20 > extern int PyDict_SetItem(PyObject *p, PyObject *key, PyObject *val) > __attribute__((cpython_param_must_be_hashable (key)) ...though this implies supporting parameter names in attributes (is there a= BZ for this?)=