From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6B493395C010; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:15:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B493395C010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668676516; bh=vVr7Q5rM9jhIlYFqq6iwTeUAR5h+AARLpCBwZgGElYw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sRBqDdb3NxC0zn+L/GJ2bGU24meOEWQlnT8a5xLygm3jfdKFIQ95RYLlic19t0Hvs OwNZedqCzdqB8JzFkfI6UArAnREG0fHj7ORD37FjtazwGe9TtfIVI9ijwXVWSt6lKk Rztvf2BrbcP9XTGAyT8NZZlDFSG2eWn3nitS3z94= From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107647] [12/13 Regression] GCC 12.2.0 may produce FMAs even with -ffp-contract=off Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 09:15:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107647 --- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > Created attachment 53917 [details] > patch I am testing >=20 > OK, I'm testing the following then - can you see if that works for the > complex fmas and if the aarch64 testsuite needs any adjustments?=20 > (-ffp-contract=3Dfast is default) Will do, this needs a check on the type no? SVE2 adds complex integer MLAs which should be fine (we didn't split the IFNs).=