From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9E7FA3858D1E; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 20:49:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9E7FA3858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668199761;
	bh=dyPivXaDMUH3GEUL9dF6XvH5Cp4E+rUADmeoUh4bdSg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=P/vyrO9m7k2WH+o8fhPOtW7TKEXSsj57NUUj2jcHhsCGlzELEgpMQEdUezTYbnpYr
	 8Jc1/MzZSLdVUL6zipOeVcEJiz5OzwLymFKUZeiw5vboQeYGBbUnSXmVGCW0ecIi7U
	 yoJ7D/9iKbDy3ISiU6PWVhlIDCD0C7i2bBgifeX0=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107649] New std::complex specializations are never
 used
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 20:49:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-107649-4-ibrSrCYkiy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107649-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107649-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107649

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-11
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think we just need all the new __complex_abs, __complex_pow etc. overload=
s to
be earlier in the file.=