From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 189643858284; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 10:53:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 189643858284
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668336819;
	bh=sluN0uJFcY0aOttY5BNobd9Zp1IKZ2JEHIbcbESX4II=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LXIDgUYRnpe5p+APZ5IdOatJk7XS/lahdJUaT1YeCNsDcyAocmQ8CbCnhoUU9GKV4
	 FiFWL9f3PEdHGdoYXB6oLAxvL0oi+LwObTYOx+mqMet/4KKAYCJQpMU15q3b3FH1aT
	 4BPajWsXWbSEjNdkQXY2JWLIS7n9w8+sj1eZsV/s=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug web/107651] Having two different kind of indexes is very useful
 still
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 10:53:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: web
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution cc
Message-ID: <bug-107651-4-NXzhDsYVKi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107651-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107651-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107651

Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
                 CC|                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #0)
> The texinfo generated indexes had two different kind of index.
> One for options and one for Concepts.
> I think for the user manual this should definitely stay around.
>=20
> If we could split it the concepts even further like lists all pargmas
> together and all attributes together that would even be better.

Sphinx is even better here, it builds index listing based on Directives (ty=
pes
of category): https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/genindex.html

>=20
> Since indexes are currently broken, PR 107643. It is hard to tell what it
> will be like.

They are all avaiable.=