From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D71FC3858436; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 19:25:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D71FC3858436 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668367544; bh=4VTSoQa2yjLophdClzeAd5HtmqyY/hmacrDoBvWLdbU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HNRhnGhNiD2PmL/j69lWFCef/YcLaG2H3G3rn+6DfaGMlUVGhxn7+nr4yjNde9n6t ZrwDl8F0t1LPMgl1hUrxp2cEjFBKdwZrthqOTwuaDwNQK5Hl+s4s6tivAs3WxgFRRo nS0vK9GrmCdxWxaPbPg59jd6YLnv6iF1CV/Ojxcc= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/107653] how-to-use-inline-assembly-language-in-c-code page is huge and should be split up Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 19:25:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation, inline-asm X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107653 Martin Li=C5=A1ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2022-11-13 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot g= nu.org CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- Confirmed, the shared doc/md.rst file is shared in between gcc and gccint manual, where md.rst contains many ' .. only:: gccint' directives. But yes, we should split it a bit.=