From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 50EBF3858D38; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 00:17:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 50EBF3858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668212264;
	bh=pkWEUivDwnv9+XX2y/HEgnFH3XiQq0uuWWBhRoYLuvg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=wovm6I/JCY0YhYnREgz7kayyBsdyVGttQ0NUxfjkXws6pcRQNBB4OoLc8BYrEsYfm
	 MsqwqHuKDT7831SNO18PKYXSKUT7WwX4JFDTRaaZ4J0A3QGy2uQ0YpXMoloU9zs9Cu
	 q1IGDmduif/iL3BVIoQ/p8lg9foADfOgOjC+G4lk=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/107653] how-to-use-inline-assembly-language-in-c-code page is
 huge and should be split up
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 00:17:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation, inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107653-4-gzPARWX1YP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107653-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107653-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107653

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I thought it went one layer deap but nope it is kinda of random.
For an example:
Not split up:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/target-macros/register-classes.html

Splitted up:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/target-macros/stack-layout-and-callin=
g-conventions.html

Both are on the same level and both have similar amount of information on e=
ach
section as far as I can tell.

Does anyone understand how it was decided to split it up vs not splitting u=
p?=