From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0818F385828E; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 00:20:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0818F385828E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668212429;
	bh=45knxgDnM5mZ7i3AdvPSYgsdxiRCvCTniuxjTiiqVOc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tIC6+7tiKuCq/7MwJgfEr1Bx4w2X1wbcWa5HWAO7+573H8mtu7BLlnkb1J6uxJGis
	 XuA9R4VGkZSKy1wS8qBoROWkLzC3RLQuGnQo2BFMxy4THMl02Y+N6XBWoJ+28RlQ+w
	 wPzVSU6cMx9tqYZmfD3q8AyYmCjahmdSZVzn+0QA=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/107653] how-to-use-inline-assembly-language-in-c-code page is
 huge and should be split up
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 00:20:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation, inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107653-4-mLSw6AkTjT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107653-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107653-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107653

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I thought it went one layer deap but nope it is kinda of random.
> For an example:
> Not split up:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/target-macros/register-classes.html
>=20
> Splitted up:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/target-macros/stack-layout-and-call=
ing-
> conventions.html
>=20
> Both are on the same level and both have similar amount of information on
> each section as far as I can tell.
>=20
> Does anyone understand how it was decided to split it up vs not splitting=
 up?

Sorry I copied the wrong one which was not split up.
I Mean
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/target-macros/register-usage.html#

Also the left side bar has an arrow next to that one but it expands to noth=
ing.=