From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9969F38582A1; Sun, 13 Nov 2022 19:30:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9969F38582A1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668367838;
	bh=aw1nq7LgEoid/tVgkrsJohOM6yMItMfdje1fbGgbXXo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=uVHBug8tREeFr2hQGDECdxSq+coEIKQrnQ/iGTh5wOXABiBJpf85RmrHj0/p3LA26
	 4AtPdazRAf2hkB78nm3kUBw0qq+IrN14n66BEmxUfpVN93erV2kakqInz6I0ib2aoS
	 JROcPSjs2yFySwYKTcmNRk8FNCrL6kBvCr77I0p4=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/107656] post sphinx conversion, can't tell between a
 target macro or a target hook
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 19:30:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed bug_status cc cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-107656-4-1fx9v76pk2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107656-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107656-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107656

Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-13

--- Comment #2 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, it's a small drawback. One can distinguish macros by missing return ty=
pe,
but I can imagine adding a

.. note::

  Target macro

for such macros that have arguments. These w/o arguments are hopefully
distinguishable from hooks.=