From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 83E883858D20; Sun, 12 Nov 2023 22:46:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 83E883858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699829180;
	bh=j/UAKPLU1oQuoypxnFXNgXlZa0XeOxFV3t2gJ/qLH40=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=onuQ+2OZjwM1hITSX9Ojcy7EGaoZuKGoQFJ2PvAhlW+oQ76iQM70WRqv1Ng3JsNqC
	 qI+fJ5UdPW2ceqo60ZdQvv7Iap0jQAvBk+crclQu3DHuY87b94ParpJpQ1ut/tvDBS
	 4xPMgAhFzJMoGvY3hAvmEhJW6TGzN8qZ5d/rwHTo=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107671] i386: Missed optimization: use of bt in bit test
 pattern (using -O2 -mtune=core2)
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 22:46:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-107671-4-UQcz332VR7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107671-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107671-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107671

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-11-12
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.

bt32_setb2, bt32v_setb, bt32v_setb2 are the only ones done for 64bit.=