From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F26D538518A1; Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:17:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F26D538518A1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668446227; bh=K5PWfcMoTwr7nlGEy2nIkRk7cSYauHBlnkRqcp4KCj8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=fGx3scqYhIqy7LBipn8dpgEsZGPnyIFn84nVdhJaZETHGVsLH+3q0wimTGmfZHm2Y sgW37mtLMecqKVRcpEyu1BmLUyshF3bq++cPsdE4CBYHrpHHSJ+kXhtwBpicNgbS96 00RZsTbB7hkxX9Y9WRhDcbxh8VNq42sx/v9kOO+g= From: "avieira at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcc/107678] New: [13 Regression] Segfault in aarch64_fallback_frame_state Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:17:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107678 Bug ID: 107678 Summary: [13 Regression] Segfault in aarch64_fallback_frame_state Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hi, We ran into a segfault when running SPEC 2017 Parest for aarch64-none-linux= -gnu on a Neoverse V1 target after g:146e45914032 These are the relevant frames of the segfault: #0 0x0000ffff8bd2dd04 in aarch64_fallback_frame_state (context=3D0xffffe11= f6e10, fs=3D0xffffe11f71d0) at ./md-unwind-support.h:74 #1 uw_frame_state_for (context=3Dcontext@entry=3D0xffffe11f6e10, fs=3Dfs@entry=3D0xffffe11f71d0) at .../libgcc/unwind-dw2.c:1275 #2 0x0000ffff8bd2f0ec in _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=3D0x36b105d0) at .../libgcc/unwind.inc:104 #3 0x0000ffff8be8d6b4 in __cxxabiv1::__cxa_throw (obj=3D, tinfo=3D0x56bf58 , dest=3D0x468c00 ) at .../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_throw.cc:93 We do not see the same failure for a NEON only run, so the size of the vect= ors could be a hint? But I haven't confirmed this.=