From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B8FC33853D57; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:07:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8FC33853D57
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668755255;
	bh=ZJRHGwFQaXp+lZ2iR1VRU+3qKaczi3Bmdv/gSiP8TRM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Ci0dxX2bsjGk/g/usi798/lY/bHq4xJhB/bZi+Sw+RfIqAEkQr/IgibuJua+7KYGi
	 budWGkm9Mg/fc1aH3UwmXUtbEivB1SSrZXjWZaKpGfkyP4c3rT9OxSzhWRIgtMurJ5
	 Wxsherz+krC9EA0H1YzMFws7DXrL+zcTEeOgkMvs=
From: "wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107692] [13 regression] r13-3950-g071e428c24ee8c breaks
 many test cases
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:07:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107692-4-6OLtkt8MVj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107692

--- Comment #6 from Hongyu Wang <wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #4)
> (In reply to Hongyu Wang from comment #2)
> > Created attachment 53897 [details]
> > A patch
> >=20
> > Sorry for introducing these fails. Here is the patch.
> >=20
> > I've tested the patch with cross-compler and all the fails disappeared,=
 but
> > I don't have a powerpc to do full bootstrap & regtest (I'm still applyi=
ng
> > for gcc farm account).
> >=20
> > I'll send out the patch after I can access gcc farm for a power machine=
, or
> > hopefully someone can help testing the patch.
> >=20
> > I suppose s390 has similar issue and I will update that accordingly.
> Hi,
>=20
> One small comment, for code "if (!(flag_unroll_loops ||
> flag_unroll_all_loops))"
> we may need to add one more condition "|| loop->unroll", like what does in
> r13-3950 for i386.cc.  Otherwise, unroll pragma may be affected.

Yes, I've already posted the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606478.html=