From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 981673857C4F; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:11:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 981673857C4F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668751889;
	bh=w2otnezR1uLZBqisG7LXeaUZmew+9gf8JpHr7zdYTIc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=S5uifMZee/YpJdE4XIRTem5pEVDWRgW9YPBHxl5InH7Akc/Z+dGtzjrMGETSizy2P
	 mnUBbF+UcXHjA7ZuDswC9Gib0RySh7IcNlFS2IgOYpXjIYBGgONm2ToL+zYXWUCHO1
	 Zs7xrrilgYYcXqVATs48peyzIPHBAArhnVewfTAY=
From: "guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107692] [13 regression] r13-3950-g071e428c24ee8c breaks
 many test cases
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:11:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-107692-4-964DzzejtF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107692

Jiu Fu Guo <guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Jiu Fu Guo <guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongyu Wang from comment #2)
> Created attachment 53897 [details]
> A patch
>=20
> Sorry for introducing these fails. Here is the patch.
>=20
> I've tested the patch with cross-compler and all the fails disappeared, b=
ut
> I don't have a powerpc to do full bootstrap & regtest (I'm still applying
> for gcc farm account).
>=20
> I'll send out the patch after I can access gcc farm for a power machine, =
or
> hopefully someone can help testing the patch.
>=20
> I suppose s390 has similar issue and I will update that accordingly.
Hi,

One small comment, for code "if (!(flag_unroll_loops ||
flag_unroll_all_loops))"
we may need to add one more condition "|| loop->unroll", like what does in
r13-3950 for i386.cc.  Otherwise, unroll pragma may be affected.=