From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C359B384D0C0; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:11:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C359B384D0C0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668780710;
	bh=aMnLSiBCH3XlwIZ8brS4oH3fsQd2t3MqoKxQH8Z3wiw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ugJ0V6ygAbBpEpXuQJZaKRVNALAuKxBiZYsdbDl6mk701YEMp4jytXejA9fIFZoNF
	 Wz+b+93N/jn9EqJFgv7H6soKOqqW8oncFp4mscnYm9+3gAu7iqu7waJtVHT2w4Uvy2
	 aR8m8kiWLwi7KZ+FnbKvE7I6LpQJXhnawJxSUunU=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107692] [13 regression] r13-3950-g071e428c24ee8c breaks
 many test cases
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:11:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107692-4-Z1oxq0rfeP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107692

--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #5)
> > -munroll-only-small-loops does not turn on or off -funroll-loops, and it
> > should not, so that it does what it says, if nothing else.
>=20
> Yes, and -funroll-loops would win over -munroll-only-small-loops

-funroll-loops is the only thing that enables loop unrolling.
-munroll-only-small-loops, like the name says, says to only unroll small lo=
ops,
and no others.  It is not something at the same level as -funroll-loops, th=
at
would be insanity: other code likes to see if the user requested loops to be
unrolled as well!=