From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7FF85382EF13; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 07:02:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7FF85382EF13 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668495765; bh=DqPTS3C9fv6C5IE3c59KhJbjFw0TuXEskmK4SjFCeQw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZaWzNB0grPLRoaNFsiTM7tr1aBzDT6Yv7qEmahqpyD5qWeoH4orMm8QQR596B3iWz WEsaOE8aBa8AytKK6ZfsoOQdhsZXWWVPOu24jofxigLCAcNNuC/wzBGPZc9DhqrAYs 91YWti5jp//3SsD4aL7xIwkx9qdGh/hkDyk5mUU0= From: "wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107692] [13 regression] r13-3950-g071e428c24ee8c breaks many test cases Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 07:02:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107692 --- Comment #2 from Hongyu Wang --- Created attachment 53897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D53897&action=3Dedit A patch Sorry for introducing these fails. Here is the patch. I've tested the patch with cross-compler and all the fails disappeared, but= I don't have a powerpc to do full bootstrap & regtest (I'm still applying for= gcc farm account). I'll send out the patch after I can access gcc farm for a power machine, or hopefully someone can help testing the patch. I suppose s390 has similar issue and I will update that accordingly.=