From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 128EB385700E; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:13:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 128EB385700E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668752021;
	bh=UcAdYCkWUGgPm7zczx5BCQn0NvKYjbsFztNHfLAsx1Y=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=by557cgskFwlA5MkHALMcrnxGB+0Kh5FBluvo4HCbwLJcm8AxPMzOadv4QyoU3e4Z
	 vobsU7qqpE5RxG+d6i06EtamLB4NvQ8AYlpG41h15PYETeNuSGsbgI6XFO8aOBa1fe
	 2k6CjnlwZBLDAMMY2YcKLYHrqpKluLeH8HZL1coU=
From: "guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/107692] [13 regression] r13-3950-g071e428c24ee8c breaks
 many test cases
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:13:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107692-4-ogVeDidOBF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107692

--- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo <guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> -munroll-only-small-loops does not turn on or off -funroll-loops, and it
> should not, so that it does what it says, if nothing else.

Yes, and -funroll-loops would win over -munroll-only-small-loops=