public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/107699] False positive -Warray-bounds, non-existent offset reported by GCC
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:34:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107699-4-4h2Zg1OWFR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107699-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107699

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-11-16
                 CC|                            |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It diagnoses

if (&MEM <int[3]> [(void *)&data + 64B] != __i_32)

and the code is confused about the <int[3]> type and the address-taken
special allowing taking the address of one after the array.  All the
second-guessing whats the "array access" performed here (none!) is wrong.

If the address is inside or one after the object then it's OK.

Here we guess an element size of 12, visible by

warning: array subscript 16 is outside array bounds of 'std::array<int, 3> [1]'

but no idea where the [1] comes from.  The code might try to match
some useful cases but it should give up in a more forgiving way when it
gets totally wrong in cases like this.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15 14:10 [Bug c++/107699] New: " carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com
2022-11-16 13:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-11-16 13:34 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107699] 12/13 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-16 14:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107699] [12/13 " carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com
2022-11-23  3:00 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-29 13:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-29 13:41 ` carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com
2022-11-29 13:46 ` carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com
2022-11-29 17:54 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-11-29 17:58 ` carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com
2022-12-08 10:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-08 10:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-16 10:37 ` carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com
2023-05-08 12:26 ` [Bug tree-optimization/107699] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-15 13:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107699-4-4h2Zg1OWFR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).