From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CCDEE3952507; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 01:55:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CCDEE3952507 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668650126; bh=iJZe8Q6KPUvYAxS2YHw7atMX9Lm8sInZjnsIUe/G7R4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=QTJ5Z5avRXUs/jYqc2xk5aTzQfx4Guz35xA9ipa2mmRWj2cB7KjAGkLUXliiq8+o4 RLTwoarr9WqXfikEMa9D2WiAM6BHMd25r4NGQA4K9Bhnz4Lpr5MvAke9bgY2BY9PO/ Lm6aRzIkRBQiDJzTR+5Pfdbdqy4aKQzmYR6lJ5ZA= From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107704] [13 Regression] Testsuite regression after recent DCE changes Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 01:55:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107704 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- ACK. And as I mentioned, the RTL form looks like it ought to be caught by = the SH specific code to optimize T reg handling. I don't care enough about the= SH to try and debug a missed optimization though.=