From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E1A57396D811; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:48:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E1A57396D811 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668631688; bh=OXxPbHwpEjyeoOnNeCk6IzbvpK2buasU6jiFaxXVaFg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ddp1wqshrFZQAoZlCmNXP8iri+iNl5laOLWf1Iw8pekKK7SF0LTYSZCXJ73o/9qlO cdZJ+Wx8uQpPlmQ9Zy/Bmabn95fZoaTPTVXJ3S6cP8DEeHvY0/XhVAvYok+x+NiVyH W8UBJIM8/419wWtIUM1scgfZz/0vurzakMPB52LY= From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107720] [13 regression] New C++ library test cases (and many others) in r13-3936-g1d9454aba615ea fail Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:48:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107720 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to seurer from comment #0) > g:1d9454aba615eadd0d85c93713dd848227345f67, r13-3936-g1d9454aba615ea >=20 > This was on a make check of a simple (non-bootstrap) built compiler. I o= nly > see this on one system. It's specific to systems using _GLIBCXX_LONG_DOUBLE_ALT128_COMPAT which mea= ns LE systems with a new-enough glibc to support IEEE128. > FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2020/all_no_exceptions.cc (test for excess erro= rs) > Excess errors: > /home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test2/powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu/libstd= c++- > v3/include/format:2566: error: '_Args_next_value_' was not declared in th= is > scope; did you mean '_Arg_next_value_'? Doh, that's what I get for making changes after testing on a powerpc64le machine with a recent glibc, and then not re-testing.=