From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0943C388E823; Wed, 16 Nov 2022 22:31:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0943C388E823
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668637873;
	bh=Bgqkf0OkqEHYQWN4cWE7YWqxGHPJnCMAgqi6gdMFpzE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=P2h5YEOChX9udcO9i0RybsmgH7ao8S2ijzwRL+V1xa8lwQJOboGCT8yKnRDxb8c1F
	 iQWwS73iyqUx0XCRmm4epb2BMxmJM0EaodJg96a8hpXlpcRYXUlan17lMZf4j/nupO
	 9NxC7GK1uK/q6GSEmmg9uZp4sxjwTmBrXHyW+UNw=
From: "compnerd at compnerd dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107729] unhelpful handling for PMF on Itanium ABI for
 inline asm
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 22:31:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: compnerd at compnerd dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107729-4-exMpvrXK7S@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107729-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107729-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107729

--- Comment #3 from Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd dot org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > <source>:6:1: warning: unsupported size for integer register
>=20
> I get that when I use:
> #%0 %1

This totally makes sense - the value is a pointer pair, so it does detect t=
hat
will overflow.  IMO that is a positive and hopefully will deter people from
doing this in practice at least.=