From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 21A3C3852C47; Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:56:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 21A3C3852C47
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1668714991;
	bh=sTdLcxv2QS6oQU/9WVTRZztdE0MeHFIBq/XwR/Q8ybE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eeJ82ltGByVrSCsbDBshhD3wjhY6FAYxXFMElYAP+M9xuqHdzYnAhliCALtm/M7bO
	 3yYjnob4C+OvhrDxC4JfBXnFVPg7Z74HHZpp04TbuWvHYIH8xoU3AvQZ3hxrqe5fZg
	 rL0nNN5565vCm9UgxGb2ZBh+MNiE354yzB9Vg9mg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/107738] Top-level inline-asm is not well documented
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:56:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: documentation, inline-asm
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107738-4-0IHWtdp2nh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107738-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107738-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107738

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I know there are other related bugs where people mess up the top-level
inline-asm too but I can't find them right now.=