public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107745] long double constexprs don't work with * or /, but work with + and - (JUST ON PPC)
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:14:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107745-4-OrpkUfKiCE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107745-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107745

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sebastian "spaetz" Spaeth from comment #5)
> I fully understand that nobody wants to invest time into fixing this. What
> would be nice though, is if this were really just a missed optimization and
> not rejecting to compile valid code.
> 
> powerpc could ignore the constexpr in this case, rather than failing to
> build?

It will be an violation of the standard (at least in some cases).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-20 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-18  8:50 [Bug c++/107745] New: " Sebastian at SSpaeth dot de
2022-11-18  9:00 ` [Bug c++/107745] " schwab@linux-m68k.org
2022-11-18  9:07 ` Sebastian at SSpaeth dot de
2022-11-18  9:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-18  9:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-18  9:36 ` Sebastian at SSpaeth dot de
2024-02-20 15:14 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-02-20 15:26 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-20 17:19 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-107745-4-OrpkUfKiCE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).