[Bug target/107748] [13 Regression] Isn't _mm_cvtsbh_ss incorrect?

["cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107748

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec8ec09f9414be871e322fecf4ebf53e3687bd22

commit r13-4187-gec8ec09f9414be871e322fecf4ebf53e3687bd22
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Nov 21 10:28:27 2022 +0100

    i386: Uglify some local identifiers in *intrin.h [PR107748]

    While reporting PR107748 (where is a problem with non-uglified names,
    but I've left it out because it needs fixing anyway), I've noticed
    various spots where identifiers in *intrin.h headers weren't uglified.
    The following patch fixed those that are related to unions (I've grepped
    for [a-zA-Z]\.[a-zA-Z] spots).
    The reason we need those to be uglified is the same as why the arguments
    of the inlines are __ prefixed and most of automatic vars in the inlines
    - say a, v or u aren't part of implementation namespace and so users could
     #define u whatever->something
     #include <x86intrin.h>
    and it should still work, as long as u is not e.g. one of the names
    of the functions/macros the header provides (_mm* etc.).

    2022-11-21  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR target/107748
            * config/i386/avx512fp16intrin.h (_mm512_castph512_ph128,
            _mm512_castph512_ph256, _mm512_castph128_ph512,
            _mm512_castph256_ph512, _mm512_set1_pch): Uglify names of local
            variables and union members.
            * config/i386/avx512fp16vlintrin.h (_mm256_castph256_ph128,
            _mm256_castph128_ph256, _mm256_set1_pch, _mm_set1_pch): Likewise.
            * config/i386/smmintrin.h (_mm_extract_ps): Likewise.