From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C36BC384F486; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:31:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C36BC384F486 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668771075; bh=3nGM6DeXxT2UTaWvo2FEYqQx8LGZMvN9FQaBxT/FrRM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xfmDuZ491NKUmsMkerlZxjykboOnR8izpiONAEkzpTxkgD5QKvBNqS+MSQIX5t06y TmA99Ck88zbIHkXxMoSaZKj55EgnXHl3yzFZ6wJ+JmUKSgBoF/IQaI4mCXHQPZ3PPm rIwvyMX+nGkoCCH9K84XAe6peJFIFLAbeDusGGCE= From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107748] [13 Regression] Isn't _mm_cvtsbh_ss incorrect? Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 11:31:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: crazylht at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107748 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- float _mm_cvtsbh_ss (__bf16 __A) { union{ float sf; __bf16 bf[2];} __tmp; __tmp.sf =3D 0.0f; __tmp.bf[1] =3D __A; return __tmp.sf; } Looks like gcc can optimize it to _mm_cvtsbh_ss(bool _Accum): movd %xmm0, %eax sall $16, %eax movd %eax, %xmm0 ret=