From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DFFB23853D59; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:14:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DFFB23853D59 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668766465; bh=5YfCWnargPXm6LALSau405253h57XXbiC56bEOT0ang=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KKG87DLpv0pOKZTf1G/+nzXc/7kCE9tMrN3sT7/bh8yhfCvn7Z0ZjTeJJ4DmJTU+7 Sktg2dUcLxm7kG+ptzmBORoTLvWjdfBCI8H8mplrj+w7tF4mEp52VGvKuo5yNClL8w cCdf60yMmnnb75R10G+GymhSP3BQF+84KS0ePYdY= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/107748] [13 Regression] Isn't _mm_cvtsbh_ss incorrect? Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:14:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107748 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Discovered as +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512bf16-cvtsbh2ss-1.c scan-assembler-times sall[ \\\\t]+[^{\\n]*16 1 regression with my https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606398.html patch, because previously it emitted just __extendbfsf2 call + insn for SF -> USI conversion before the shift, but now it emits another shift + SF -> USI conversion instruction.=