public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pokechu022+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/107755] ICE: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2435, with -Wlogical-op, implicit user-defined conversion operator, template function, logical operator, and conditional operator
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 01:37:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-107755-4-1U0z46qW4h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-107755-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107755
Pokechu22 <pokechu022+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |10.3.0, 12.2.0, 4.8.1,
| |9.4.0
Known to work| |4.7.4
--- Comment #1 from Pokechu22 <pokechu022+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com> ---
Here are a few cases that would be useful to include in a test:
```
return (!false && (false ? a : b));
return (!true && (false ? a : b));
return (!false || (false ? a : b));
return (!true || (false ? a : b));
return (x && (y ? a : b));
return (x || (y ? a : b));
```
As an aside, `(false | (false ? a : b))` (where a is bool and b is Foo) used to
cause an ICE (confirmed in 4.7.4, 4.8.1, and 5.5). This was fixed in or before
6.1. I can't find a bug report corresponding to that issue either, but it
probably should be verified that that doesn't regress either.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-19 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-19 1:27 [Bug c++/107755] New: " pokechu022+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com
2022-11-19 1:37 ` pokechu022+gccbugzilla at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-11-21 8:53 ` [Bug c++/107755] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-21 19:48 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-21 19:49 ` [Bug c++/107755] [10/11/12/13 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-11-24 17:43 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-31 19:29 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-01 13:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-01 13:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-02-01 13:44 ` [Bug c++/107755] [10/11 " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-107755-4-1U0z46qW4h@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).