From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A8C6C384F6E6; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:07:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A8C6C384F6E6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1668884876; bh=ZgBvFl4Y4XYPziQQVYtam2N4PM9LiYFQFLQ5XMltrJI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FYG/w6csGe2IlIABJv5we5xuEeWWIL3F48xod6hW3Gdi+RQ7nv5UZixULRVa/N4y2 S7h8joSe0ZzMwUW7z+aqTy7eVGXCWO8cN4E4NoIIRTD9gtQm0XzBFYhOaTCsrfedMu Tzli3GZZLsPMZ4TsvhpM0wqCyZkMDEfiYmBarBt8= From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/107762] [13 Regression] Recent change causing regressions on s390-linux-gnu Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:07:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107762 Eric Botcazou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2022-11-19 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc do= t gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou --- > Is causing at least two regressions on s390-linux-gnu: > Tests that now fail, but worked before (19 tests): > [ ... ] > gcc.target/s390/arch12/mul-1.c scan-assembler-times \tmsgrkc\t 1 > gcc.target/s390/arch13/sel-1.c scan-assembler-times \tselgr(?:h|le)\t 1 > [ ... ] >=20 > Those are the only two that I have positively confirmed are due to the > emit_group_store change. >=20 > I looked briefly at the resulting assembly code for the mul-1 test and it > looks worse to me after that change. But I'm far from an s390 expert. Thanks for the heads up, I'll have a quick look.=