From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 20A2A385221B; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:58:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 20A2A385221B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669024706;
	bh=jzyi1idAaNxdRBPc0r3r8kfziEh/iaxovBuAqhDdWK8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=So3MhX2AQtgweOSlQt7jxV2b0KnpCUEGrV3Zgh2/of9A80p3C99OGV4hTQE1f77b/
	 ObvZ32qu5ADK6yOHtBaEp6jJcZwafQYFRMq5i8ikddyPXFVqI6t/+uxz7usq1HFSDl
	 ycyRDfj24/alnJqlTWY/G5l4mXcRBwZRNLIzSy6c=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/107778] handle_contract_violation should reflect
 _GLIBCXX_VERBOSE
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:58:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-107778-4-mGFqmnThoV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-107778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-107778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D107778

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #3)
> Also why the function is not noexcept?

Writing to streams can throw.

If you don't like the default handler you can provide your own.=